Not sure how many of you studied last week's pictures of the Schlosser set of vestments in great detail. If you did, you might have spotted the same oddities as I did. For starters, there's the 'enhancement' of the faces with oil paint. Not an unusual practice. The skill needed to work these super fine silken stitches to render the faces was something that the restorers of these late-medieval embroideries could no longer do from about the 17th century onwards. Another thing which you might have spotted was the cutting up of orphreys. Some were made less wide (breast pieces of the dalmatics) and others were turned into real patchwork pieces to cover the ends of the sleeves of the dalmatics. But there is something else. And it reminded me of a 2021 French article on or nué that I had read a while ago. Do you notice something odd about the embroidery techniques used for Mary's clothing? The 'red' is clearly or nué. But what about the 'blue'? Let's zoom in a bit! See?! The red is or nué. But the blue isn't. It is shaded brick stitching over pairs of gold threads. You could call this Burden Stitch. However, this stitch is commonly executed over a single gold thread. Odd. Since all of Mary's 'blue bits' are worked in this stitch you are forgiven for thinking that this is original. Luckily, John the Baptist can help us out here. And here is John the Baptist. His outer garment is almost completely executed in beautifully shaded or nué. But look at his left shoulder. There's a patch of this other stitch again. Executed in colours that come close to the original, but that are not the same. This 'bastard' Burden stitch is thus clearly not original. It was likely used to repair the original or nué in the mid-19th century. Probably executed by the Cologne vestment maker and his two daughters. Why did they not simply repair the area with true or nué?
To me, or nué is a relatively simple embroidery technique. It has absolutely never intimidated me. Neither does silk shading or shaded art blackwork. There's a common theme here: I can shade. It does not matter to me if I have to do the shading as part of blackwork, with long-and-short stitch or over pairs of gold threads. Neither does it bother me that or nué and blackwork are counted thread techniques and silk shading is not. It is all just shading to me. However, being in the embroidery teaching business, I soon learned that there are roughly two types of embroiderers: those that can shade and those that can't. Embroiderers who can shade a little, do not seem to exist :). Embroiderers who are, at first, intimidated by or nué often quickly get comfortable with the technique when they realise that it is just counted silk shading over a pair of gold threads. That is: embroiderers who can shade. Those that can't shade, cannot work or nué. These modern observations make the embroidery on the chasuble of the Schlosser vestment set all the more intriguing. The 'bastard' Burden stitch on Mary is very well shaded. The embroiderer could shade! Why then did he or she not work true or nué? Was it a time issue? Or did he or she not recognise the or nué technique in the first place? The latter could really have been the case. According to a comprehensive study by Astrid Castres published in 2021, the technique of or nué might have been completely lost for a couple of hundred years. It was then likely re-discovered in the second half of the 19th century. Just slightly after the restauration of the Schlosser vestments. Fascinating, don't you think? Literature Castres, A. (2021): Des premiers témoins médiévaux aux broderies des Clarisses de Mazamet : une petite histoire de l’or nué (XIVe-XXe siècle), Patrimoines du Sud 14, pp. 1–27.
3 Comments
It had not occurred to me that the technique might have been lost for a couple of centuries, but when one thinks of the experimental archaeologists rediscovering much earlier techniques, maybe that's the best explanation. As you say, the replacement work is not unskilled.
Reply
Deborah Fox
13/3/2024 19:39:22
So I've seen similar burden stitch on two other Or Nue pieces. One is a piece in the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, a Flemish Orphrey cross M70.64 dated to early 16th century. Secondly, in pictures of the Golden Fleece vestments, particularly the Chasuble, in "The Conservation of Tapestries and Embroideries", Sept 1987.(I've seen another example on the golden fleece but I can't find the picture) Both of those examples have the silk going over 3 gold threads in that same shaded Burden stitch pattern, unlike over the 4 in your example. Could it be the restorers were restoring an area that was done that way originally and misunderstood the pattern? The LACMA piece in particular is in excellent condition, and does not appear to have had any extensive restoration work done on it.
Reply
13/3/2024 22:52:38
Thank you for your comment, Deborah. Working normal or nue over two threads and then working a particular area (a book, gloves, an animal, etc.) over three by bundeling the threads differntly with the shaded couching stitches is indeed sometimes done. There's an excellent example in Museum Catharijne Convent of Saint Hubertus: https://adlib.catharijneconvent.nl/Details/collect/40676. In our orphreys from Cologne, however, the technique is quite different and worked over four gold threads. Furthermore, on John the Baptist, it is just a random patch and not a seperate design element. So, I really think that they patched up damaged areas of original or nue with a kind of a Burden stitch.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
Want to keep up with my embroidery adventures? Sign up for my weekly Newsletter to get notified of new blogs, courses and workshops!
Liked my blog? Please consider making a donation or becoming a Patron so that I can keep up the good work and my blog ad-free!
Categories
All
Archives
October 2024
|